In addition, another important point of Fisher’s theory should be to emphasize the importance of accumulating assets. Fraser’s famous saying is: Everything that can generate income is capital, interest is capital multiplied by the interest rate; and wealth is the converted value of all income. Therefore, interest is not part of income but whole of income. From this point of view, if we want to pursue wealth, we should continue to accumulate assets. The more assets that can bring us income, the more our income will naturally be, and the higher our wealth will be.
The important thing is that if we accept Fisher’s point of view, then we will have another understanding of the meaning of money. Applying Fisher’s theory, what we need to pursue should be real income, and the definition of real income is those things that can bring us spiritual happiness. If the sunshine or the laughter of a child can bring us spiritual happiness, , that is, income, is conceptually no different from what money can buy. If this is the case, the function of money and wealth is just to exchange for something that can bring us psychological income. However, the pure pursuit of money and wealth is likely to ignore the income that can be obtained from other channels, such as love, friendship, Family affection, health, honor, justice, dignity, or simply inner peace and quiet are all examples. In his 2007 graduation speech for Shantou University students, Li Ka-shing mentioned that Einstein had this sentence hanging on the door of his office at Princeton University: “Not everything that can be counted is important, and not everything that is important is important.” “Everything can be calculated.” It can be seen that even the richest people also realize the shortcomings of monetary wealth and the importance of non-monetary wealth. Yes, how to strike a balance between monetary wealth and non-monetary wealth can be a profound knowledge.
Feisha himself does not seem to be very attached to money and wealth. He was once very rich, but in the end he became a negative asset, but he can live happily. Does this mean that he can find his soul from various activities that he invests in? income, so his inner wealth may be generally increasing?
In addition, another implication of Fisher’s theory is that we should pay attention to continuous income and not be eager for quick success, because what we want to increase should be wealth, not temporary income. Fraser cherished his life very much and worked hard all day long to do things he thought were worth doing. He was also committed to doing many things that would have a long-term impact on future generations, such as promoting medical insurance, public health, and world peace. Although these time-consuming and energy-consuming work prevented him from making further academic achievements, he did not hesitate to do so. Perhaps it was because he believed that these things with long-term impact could provide what he believed to be an ongoing process. income, is it therefore the most worthwhile asset to invest in?
In any case, from Fisher’s theory of interest, Gudoudi found an implication that Fisher himself may not have cared about, but that originated from his theory of interest. Here it is: Appreciation may be one of humanity’s most valuable assets. Isn’t it? If our ability to appreciate is high, then there may be many things that can be obtained for no money at all, and we can also get great spiritual happiness from them. In this way, no matter what our circumstances are, our income and wealth are guaranteed. By analogy, events that can bring us good memories should be assets worth investing in.
The author once jokingly said to a former college friend: “If you can live with good memories, you can live at least twice as much happiness in your life.” As happier.) My friend found it quite interesting after hearing this, but he may not know that my so-called insights are actually just borrowed from the Fisher Interest Theory that he also read in college!